Hi I am conducting some research into FPS realism and after some initial research I have come to the conclusion of (and hopefully expand on) on these steps of my research….
Thus can you answer one or more of these would be a great help to me….
1)FPS exploiting USA / UK fears of terrorism?
After initial research some gamers kept saying that lots of war based FPS games (i.e. COD / BF3) are influenced / exploit the fears of terrorism that many people have (9/11 / nuclear war etc.)
2)War based FPS photo-realism weapons - (i.e. BF3 and anything else)?
Hi after more research (i know so much work lol) I keep getting feedback that weapons should be real and have all the necessary (graphics wise / feel / bullet physics / power and even small things like how many rounds you fire at one time (well my bro said that ha ha)
But ultimately what’s your view on weapon realism in FPS games, and are they needed and if so how much (i.e. your views on this subject)
3) No consequences when playing FPS - investigation.......?
Again while researching i came across Gamers love playing FPS games as they can do stuff they can’t do in real life (without the consequences)
A) Thus what’s your view on this good / bad and a bit about why..
B) But also is this a good thing to have, in that without consequences gamers could get desensitized with violence and thus may act out in real life
4)Goal based missions and competitively?
But basically do you think this is important or not when playing these games (i.e. do you want this). And what does it give to the overall game (i.e. playability / teamwork)…………
5)Finally Is teamwork in FPS important question?
Do you feel teamwork in FPS games (i.e. BF2 / 3) is good, in that does it reflect teamwork in real world (i.e. armies / paintball stuff like that). Finally would you like to have teamwork more involved in games (i.e. everyone actually does it and doesn’t do a Rambo lol)
Sorry for the amount of question but thought I might as well put all of them on here in one fell swoop